Skip to content

Isn’t It Obvious?

August 8, 2010

I recently finished reading Diane Ravitch’s book, The Death and Life of the Great American School System. I am pleased and grateful that she shares so many of the opinions I have long held about how we’re going down the wrong path in “reforming” our educational system.  Moreover, she provides research to support her views and, of course, she has years of experience working as a policy-maker, things that make her voice carry a bit more weight than mine.  To a teacher, much of what she is saying is obvious. Those of working us in the country’s urban schools have seen a great deal of truly needy families, squandered opportunities, punitive action against teachers, and woeful mismanagement.  While I was reading Ravitch’s book, I realized that it is probably not obvious to people on the outside looking in.  Like any insider, educators get so accustomed to the way things are that we take the truths we live with for granted.

I might liken it to working in the trenches: you can’t know what it’s really like unless you’ve been there and those of us who have been there will never have the same perspective on the world again.  I mean, isn’t it obvious that schools in neighborhoods with higher levels of poverty would struggle more?  Concurrently, isn’t it obvious that if we continue to provide kids in these schools with nothing but the “basics”, we are doing them (and the schools) a grave disservice?  A large part of our obligation as educators is (or should be) to equalize the playing field as much as we possibly can, but we aren’t doing that if we continue to exalt test scores over actual learning.

I could write pages and pages about the inequities in our current system.  It is difficult to narrow focus because the problems are largely interconnected and our nation’s policies and attempts at reform are so infuriatingly misdirected. While many of us have much to lose with the current narrow-minded policy,  those who have perhaps the most to lose are the people with the least resources.  I have worked almost exclusively in schools with higher levels of poverty and I usually work with English Language Learners.   Unlike a typical charter school, a public school serves all–children with mild-to-severe special needs, children who don’t speak English, children who have challenging behaviors.  We also get children who routinely get no academic support at home–no bedtime stories, no help with homework, maybe not even much conversation.  In my role, I’ve had occasion to work with all of the above, which I consider my civic and moral obligation.  The public school system is one of the best things about our democracy, because all children, at least in theory, have access to a free education.

Part of the problem with schools in lower SES neighborhoods is the children’s readiness for school when compared to their peers in middle and upper class neighborhoods. For example, I have seen a steady stream of small children who do not have well-developed vocabularies when they first start school.  There are students who can not adequately describe the objects in their environment, they do not have the words in English, nor do they know them in the home language when it’s other than English.  They have not learned to question, nor to explore their world.  They need opportunities, experiences, and in-depth conversations, things that most kids in middle class homes have as a matter of course.  I’m not issuing a complaint or excuse here, it’s just an observation. Yet, frequently, scheduling and mandates imposed by districts and administrators conflict with our ability to provide for these needs.  While many creative and skilled teachers will understand the importance of (sometimes defiantly) carving out the time for essentials such as rich language development and inquiry, there are plenty who do not.  Take these same children, several years later, after they have been fed a steady diet of rote skills and watered-down content with the intent that they do well on the state test.  It’s highly likely that they have not gotten adequate support in learning English and there still may be gaps in their academic vocabularies.  They frequently won’t do well on the standardized tests because they haven’t gotten the extensive background knowledge that will enable them to do so.  It’s hard to do well on a test if you haven’t spent time developing thinking and reasoning skills.

As a result of unresolved challenges such as this one, we get stuck in a downward spiral.  In response to low test scores, districts (and states, feds, pundits, and self-proclaimed experts) punish schools.  They increasingly place those schools in at-risk neighborhoods on chopping blocks or “watch lists”, as charter schools swoop in and skim off many of the (measurably) skilled students. Families who have adequate resources tend to remove their kids from schools with low test scores. Leaders allocate even more time (and money) on test preparation and basic skills, while cutting funding and time allotted for truly enriching programs, such as arts, sciences, social studies (or quality professional development to support teachers, for that matter.)  Politicians and school districts impose measures that favor punishing teachers over examining the wisdom of our policies.  Passionate teachers get frustrated with the process of trying to balance serving real students’ needs with the drive to raise test scores.  Many of them get burnt out and leave for less challenging school environments or for other lines of work. Left behind are the families who don’t have anywhere else to go, and those who couldn’t get there even if they did.  Teachers regularly have conversations like these, and if we get on our soapboxes we know we are preaching to the choir.

I mean, isn’t it obvious?

5 Comments leave one →
  1. ajohan permalink
    August 9, 2010 7:28 am

    Yes, it is obvious.

    And what’s also obvious is that these high powered people are not stupid and must know it’s obvious.

    What’s also obvious is how despicable it is.

  2. Gene Stuffremian permalink
    August 9, 2010 10:12 am

    Then how do you suggest that we know if kids are learning? I’m a parent of kids ages 14 to 28. I’m a strong supporter of “No Child Left Behind,” charter schools, and school-of-choice because they have forced schools to get better. Educational reform efforts happened for a reason. State mandated tests (at least in my state) test only if a child is learning the basics – reading, writing, and math. If a kid doesn’t master these things, then that kid is doomed and has little hope of mastering any other subject. Parents and the public must know if kids are learning and the only way to know, is to test. Studies have shown that physical exercise, art, music, good nutrition, vocabulary development, and skilled teachers all lead to higher reading test scores. Rote skills and watered down content do not. Your beef should be with your management if they are forcing you to use methods that don’t work. If you have good ideas, do some research, present some convincing proactive positive proposals to your principal or even to the school board.

    • August 9, 2010 3:53 pm

      1. There is little evidence that NCLB, charters, etc. have made schools get better. While scores on state tests have usually gone up since 2002, the most well-respected and tamper-proof assessment of student progress (the NAEP) has shown minimal growth. State and local agencies have been boasting of their progress, but much of that “improvement” has been a result of increased test prep and lowered standards (like changing the minimum score required for a student to be considered proficient).

      2. No one here objects to monitoring student progress. We object to using standardized tests as the primary or sole measure of whether or not schools and teachers are successful. There are many ways to know if students are learning– ongoing observation, portfolios of student work, presentations and projects, and yes, tests. Research and hard-earned experience have demonstrated that relying too heavily on standardized testing to the exclusion of other types of assessment leads to an incomplete impression of what students can really do, and encourages counterproductive actions running the gamut from teaching to the test, to gaming the system (like adjusting standards and cut scores), to full-on cheating. All of these phenomena are well-documented.

      3. “Your beef should be with your management if they are forcing you to use methods that don’t work. If you have good ideas, do some research, present some convincing proactive positive proposals to your principal or even to the school board.”
      Teachers like us are doing *exactly that* every day, and many of us are suffering professional consequences as a result. Click “teacher stories” in the category cloud on the right-hand side of the site to see my own story (“My Story” Parts I & II) of what happened when I did exactly what you just suggested.

      That’s the purpose of this blog: to show that despite many educators’ best efforts to create positive change in our public school system, we still face incredible obstacles in doing so. One such obstacle is the fact that many of our leaders have resisted common sense, research-backed proposals in favor of gimmicks and political games because it’s easier and more beneficial to them. Students haven’t benefited from the billions of dollars that have been spent on drilling and assessing only the most basic skills, but test companies, politicians, and other opportunists sure have. Keep reading!

  3. mariasallee permalink*
    August 9, 2010 11:04 am

    @ Gene The testing itself is not the problem, it is our increasing culture of basing futures of schools on that one test. Poor urban neighborhoods are getting the shortest end of the stick because it is harder to raise scores in lower SES schools and it’s harder to make AYP. While I am speaking from my own experience in such schools, I could be speaking about many urban neighborhoods across the country.

    I have been engaged in proactive proposals, not just because I am a mother of public school students but because I consider myself an advocate for the students and families who don’t have the same resources I do. However there are risks in speaking up, read Sabrina’s story in this weblog for one such example.

  4. Just The Facts permalink
    August 9, 2010 1:21 pm

    In the middle schools, teachers are not being supported by administrations. With that, one’s passion for going the extra yard becomes diminished. Principals take the credit for projects that teachers collaborate on, thus lessening future motivation to continue. CTT and Sp. Ed kids are getting short-changed as principals make backroom deals with teachers to save on payroll. The PTA biggies stroke other parents to appease principals. Is my child learning? Probably not! I would estimate 30% of 1000 will do ok in high school. Plagiarism is at its highest with principals not addressing this for fear of parent outrage. My kid doesn’t cheat! Oh yes he does! The behavior issues get swept under the rug bigtime. Differentiate instruction? Are you really serious? How does one do this to 165 students each day? Unfortunately, we are still enabling students to go home to their mommies and say, “I Be Learning.” Had I known this 16 years ago, I would be selling hot dogs on the street. Do you blame new teachers (even tenured teachers)for leaving before 5 years? They get no support, just the classroom keys and the word “Data.” Give me a freakin break already. After the NYC debacle finally got out, what kind of restructuring aare they going to do…again! Follow the money…Phew! Thank you for allowing me to vent.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: