Skip to content

Carpetbaggers and Charlatans

August 9, 2010

Today, the New York Times published an article about the preponderance of inexperienced organizations competing for federal money intended to facilitate school turnaround efforts. The Department of Education is historically well-funded under the Obama administration, and the uptick in available funds– without a commensurate uptick in effective oversight– has apparently led to something of a feeding frenzy among those who have no experience in working with so-called failing schools. In the article, Center on Education Policy president Jack Jennings said that the companies “clearly just smell the money,” while former New York City schools chancellor Rudy Crew compared the current situation to “the aftermath of the Civil War, with all the carpetbaggers and charlatans” who moved south to exploit the situation for political and financial gain.

The only aspect of this situation that surprises me is the apparent surprise of government officials and reporters like those at the New York Times. Anyone who has ever worked in or closely observed low-performing schools and school districts knows that a stunning lack of firsthand experience in education has rarely stopped the truly motivated (or wellfunded) from having undue influence in said schools.

The public has been consistently led to believe that the people who know the most about education and about these schools– the teachers and principals who have worked in them for years– are too inept to be trusted (“…Those who can’t, teach.”). The expertise that comes from direct experience doing this kind of work has been discredited because of the faulty assumption that these schools are “failing” because the people in them don’t know enough or care enough to do better. Whenever the government issues top-down mandates for what is supposed to happen in schools and classrooms, or offers teachers and students money and other external motivators to improve their performance, they send a clear message about their lack of confidence in true educational professionals.

So when the best-financed Secretary of Education in history then says,“We need everyone who cares about public education to get into the business of turning around our lowest-performing schools,” we shouldn’t be surprised when everyone–qualified or not– scrambles for their chance to get in on that business. We also shouldn’t be surprised when some of these people, faced with the kind of obstacles (poverty, violence, overcrowding, inadequate support, etc.) that stymie the real experts daily, fail miserably at great expense to all of us.


6 Comments leave one →
  1. August 9, 2010 1:06 pm

    Check out this for more hucksters feeding off federal funds:

    Schools spend millions on tutors with mixed track record at Houston Chronicle:

    NY Times also featured article today by Winerip about Gates-funded program to replace experienced elementary teachers at high needs schools with teams of “experts” including college level teachers.

  2. Tom permalink
    August 10, 2010 8:20 am

    Arne Duncan’s idea that “everyone who cares about education” should try their hand at turning around a low-performing, high-needs school is obviously silly. But not much sillier than the whole idea of turnarounds.

    What is wrong at these schools? Do Duncan and Klein and their fellow “reformers” truly believe that poor performance is caused by a culture of failure? Union rules? Inexperienced teachers (or is it burnt-out old teachers)? Do they actually believe that kids fail in high school because of what happens in the high school?

    The “reformers” never answer this question.

    What’s really silly is trying to solve a problem without identifying its cause. That’s why turnarounds don’t work. And since they don’t work, what difference does it make who does it?

  3. August 10, 2010 5:57 pm

    What’s stunning to me is that they’re still willing to throw this much money around at “consultants” and random non-educators (even the less laughable ones), when kids are still crammed 30+ to a classroom and teachers still spend thousands of dollars of our own money on supplies. We wouldn’t need to “turn around” so many schools if we’d stop these kinds of gimmicks and put teachers and students in the best possible position to teach and learn.

  4. May 18, 2014 4:26 pm

    I am not sure where you are getting your info, but good topic.
    I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.
    Thanks for fantastic info I was looking for this info for my


  1. Goin’ Whole Hog « Failing Schools
  2. Big grants can mean big problems for poor schools - Center for Teaching Quality #CTQCollab

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: